Despite a steady decline of golf course development during the past four years, builders and architects seem to be happy with the amount of work they’re doing. Quality is overriding quantity, and supply is coming more in line with demand.
|
“That could change the landscape 10 to 20 years out,” he says.
Despite the decline of the number of openings, Kass says the golf course development market is healthy.
“Supply and demand is coming into parity,” he says. “We need to fill existing supply before we increase it. In 2004, same-store rounds increased 0.7 percent more than 2003.
“The number of openings today is what it was back in the early to mid-1980s,” he adds. “It’s more appropriate.”
|
Kass says real-estate has been a big part of golf course development – 40 to 60 percent of openings during the past 10 years have been real-estate related, and 22 percent of total existing courses are real-estate related. Courses in planning and under construction still are significantly real-estate related and are in the 60-percent range of all courses in development.
Daily-fee courses also have been popular. In 2004, daily-fee courses were 58 percent of openings, and daily-fee courses consisted of 56 percent of the total supply. Many of the daily-fee courses are high-end and are more income driven than demand driven. In contrast, municipal courses were 10 percent of openings and were 5 percent of the total supply in 2004.
Courses continue to open in familiar areas. The states with the most course openings last year are: Florida, California, Texas, Arizona, New York, Georgia and Pennsylvania. One reason why Florida leads the way (with 13) is because of its increasing population. Even though these states lead, the number of course openings in each state declined compared with years past.
Additionally, rounds played and course closings, which are linked to the economy and 9/11, are two reasons for the development decline. Rounds played decreased 4.5 percent during 2002 and 2003, and there was an increase of closures during the past five years – 200 courses closed from 2001 to 2004. However, there still are a relatively high number of courses in the planning stage – 410 – but not all will come to fruition.
“Golf course development doesn’t always relate to the statistical demand of golfers,” Shapland says. “Most of our projects are an amenity to an overall development.”
In the works
Even though development has slowed, it hasn’t crimped the business of some builders and architects. Lee’s Summit, Mo.-based Mid-America Golf & Landscape is working on four new construction and four renovation projects.
|
Most of the courses being built are daily-fee and public-sector-types, Boylan says. However, three of the new courses the company is building are private near residences. Four or five years ago, that type of course consisted of 80 percent of the courses that were built in the industry, he says.
Boylan isn’t looking to grow the company significantly. He would like to maintain six to eight projects a year and earn 15 percent to 18 percent profit margins on those projects.
“Our goal is not so much to grow, but to manage better,” he says. “But, there’s a lot of work out there for fall and winter. There are still projects that people want finished in time to meet the grassing window to get play next season.
Bidding intensifies for renovation work |
A challenge for some architects and builders lately has been to find enough renovations and international work to fill the void created by the decline of new courses in the United States. |
Business also is going well for Waunakee, Wis.-based Oliphant Golf Construction, which has been in business since 1997. President Mike Oliphant says the company will work on 10 to 12 projects this year, six of which are new construction. Throughout the years, half the company’s work has been new construction, and half has been renovation.
All of Oliphant’s current jobs, except for two, are west of the Mississippi River – five are in California and two are in Oregon.
And Fazio Golf Course Designers isn’t complaining either. It has remained relatively busy and is selective about the projects it accepts, according to Tom Marzolf, a golf course architect with the firm and president of the American Society of Golf Course Architects.
“We have a relatively full load of projects,” Marzolf says. “We haven’t seen much of a lull throughout the past five years. We are fortunate enough to look at many of the best projects in the country, and because of Tom Fazio’s reputation, we haven’t seen much decline in our business. And we have a lot of repeat business, which has helped us.
“We don’t really turn work away, but we pick and choose to some degree,” he adds. “Our situation isn’t standard in the industry. We look for an owner who is passionate about building quality golf courses. The relationship with the owner is often more important than the site of the golf course.”
The firm’s business is primarily designing new 18-hole golf courses.
“We are very client oriented and try to build what our clients believe will help them achieve their goals and objectives,” Marzolf says. “Since 9/11, most projects are high-quality real-estate golf communities, or real-estate is involved in some way. There are very few stand-alone golf courses being built right now.”
The number of projects Fazio Design works on varies. Marzolf says the firm averaged five to seven new golf courses a year throughout the past several years.
“We also limit renovation work,” he says. “There are so many of our golf courses that need long-range planning and renovation assistance that oftentimes it’s hard to get involved with golf courses where we have no history.”
More work
Oliphant and Boylan are working on more projects now than they were a few years ago. Oliphant, who has grown his business from 10 employees in 1997 to 400 now, says because his company is a small- to medium-size company, it wasn’t affected by the decline of new golf course construction a few years ago. He says the larger companies that were building 35 to 40 courses a year were more affected. Oliphant’s company averaged about six projects a year during ’02 and ’03. Last year, the company completed eight. Of those projects, half were new construction and half were renovation.
“After ’01, we saw a drastic downward spiral with high-risk, high-end projects that we’re seeing back on our desks now,” he says.
|
“We saw a decline in new construction being replaced with remodeling,” Boylan says. “Our gross project value declined about 40 percent, from $12 million to $8 million. The price of work wasn’t as profitable a few years ago. Some projects were taken at cost. Companies were buying work. We participated in that to keep people working, but it wasn’t 50 percent of our work.
“We started to see an increase in October of last year,” he adds. “It just felt like with the low interest rates, the banks had loosened their grip on things, and people who were talking about projects started getting things done. However, the increased cost of building materials and fuel has been dramatic, and we eventually pass those costs to the end-user. During the past 12 months, we doubled what we normally would generate in revenue: We just broke the $22-million mark.”
A look ahead
Despite the increase of business, Oliphant is cautious about the development market in the future.
“To go from six projects to 10 in a couple years, I didn’t have to add a lot to the company – we can handle it,” he says. “But to take on several more projects, I will have to add overhead to the company. We will level off at 10 projects. I don’t want to get any bigger. We’re a medium-size company, and I’d be tickled to keep eight to 10 projects a year. I want to stay solid and build relationships with the architects we work with.”
|
“There have been golf courses built for X value and twice as many being sold for half that, and some are foreclosing,” he says. “We all know stand-alone golf courses are difficult to make work, and there’s not a quick return on investment with a golf course.”
Marzolf says slow construction growth will continue.
“It’s market driven,” he says. “There’s an oversupply of tee times, and we need to increase the number of golfers. Real-estate is the reason there will be 150 golf courses openings this year.
“Existing golf courses need to figure out how to compete with these new facilities,” he adds. “Master planning is the key element to competing. Owners need to study their facilities to find out how to grow their businesses because the market will be tough for many years. My platform as the ASGCA president is to get involved with existing golf courses and work on developing master plans for them.”
Bob Pinson, president of Gainsville, Ga.-based Course Crafters, hopes the industry can get on the same page and encourage more people to play golf because more people playing golf is job insurance for builders.
“We’re pricing ourselves where too many people can’t afford to play,” Pinson says.
Shapland says the housing-development boom isn’t helping golf course development because land values are so high that it’s difficult to designate 200 acres to a golf course. However, he says development will remain healthy.
“Golf course development is attractive and will sustain itself for a while longer.” GCN
John Walsh is the editor of Golf Course News. He can be reached at jwalsh@gie.net.
Explore the July 2005 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Golf Course Industry
- Editor’s notebook: Green Start Academy 2024
- USGA focuses on inclusion, sustainability in 2024
- Greens with Envy 65: Carolina on our mind
- Five Iron Golf expands into Minnesota
- Global sports group 54 invests in Turfgrass
- Hawaii's Mauna Kea Golf Course announces reopening
- Georgia GCSA honors superintendent of the year
- Reel Turf Techs: Alex Tessman