Monroe Miller |
“When was the last time you could stand on one end of the equipment show and see the other end?” asked one GCSAA member of another as they surveyed the show floor at February’s annual industry conference and show. It was an oft-asked question in Orlando. I didn’t actually hear anyone complain about a smaller show floor and fewer exhibitors. The comments were mostly an expression of mild surprise and maybe even approval. Clearly, these observations were made by superintendents who worked during golf’s boom times of the not too distant past and who have seen the “big” shows. Grizzled old veterans, like myself, can remember a time when a show the size of 2011’s would have been huge; there have been regional turf shows in recent times that rivaled in size the first GCSAA shows I attended in the early 1970s. In many ways a smaller show floor is better – even much better. You have a chance to see all of the booths and exhibits. A smaller show gives you time to do some serious shopping, spend time with manufacturers and look long and hard at machinery and products that interest you. You can question engineers and research scientists who are at the show for that exact purpose. A smaller show is more social because you have the time to stop and talk with colleagues and friends you may only get to see at a conference. For me, that includes people I’ve known for nearly four decades now. Seeing them is very important to me. And, when you are on my side of, say 50, physical demands of a smaller show are more reasonable. A show like Orlando provides areas to sit, relax, chat and enjoy lunch. Some past venues provided absolutely no relief from sore feet and a tired back. In fact, one reason I didn’t like the first couple of shows shared with CMAA was their enormity. Before organizers got smart, the two interests ¬ golf course and clubhouse ¬ were so totally integrated you had to walk the entire show floor just to see course management products. The size of this year’s show reflected the economic realities of our times. In past years, when we had a big banquet dinner and entertainment, attendance figures were announced from the head table with great fanfare. It was expected each conference and show would break the previous year’s attendance. “The bigger the better” was the goal. Those were the zenith days of golf and they are over, at least for a while. In singing the praises of a smaller equipment show, I admit to the luxury of ignoring the revenue aspects of a larger one. The advantages for me are worth whatever that cost is. GCSAA is managing their economic situation pretty well, as near as I can tell. Attending the conference and show is still a very worthwhile and terrific experience. Let me finish with an expense report of my successor and his assistant, Chad Grimm and Jake Schneider. They had another productive and enjoyable conference, and they didn’t break their travel budget to do it. Here’s how they attended the Orlando GIS for only a $306 charge to their education budget.
Also worth noting is that they traveled on the bookend weekends and missed only a week out of the shop. Golf was planned on a nearby resort golf course where a former junior player at our club is the assistant golf professional. Even their fun came cheap.
|
Explore the March 2011 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Golf Course Industry
- Advanced Turf Solutions and The Aquatrols Company release soil surfactant
- Heritage Golf Group acquires North Carolina courses
- Editor’s notebook: Green Start Academy 2024
- USGA focuses on inclusion, sustainability in 2024
- Greens with Envy 65: Carolina on our mind
- Five Iron Golf expands into Minnesota
- Global sports group 54 invests in Turfgrass
- Hawaii's Mauna Kea Golf Course announces reopening