Pat Jones Editorial Director and Publisher |
I’m writing this from seat 5B inside a big metal bird blasting over the Rocky Mountains on my way back from the Peaks & Prairies GCSA annual conference and show in Billings, Mont. It was an awesome event, but also a reality check. Allow me to explain… I’ve always loved the chance to participate in chapter events and regional conferences. I get to see old friends and make new ones and, unbelievably, I’m often given the chance to rant and rave about some industry topic for an hour. I’ve been giving the same speech for 25 years and, incredibly, no one has caught on. Go figure. It’s tougher and tougher for me to get to regional events as my job description has gotten broader, but I could not say no to the fabulous Lori Russell, the empress of the northwest chapters, when she asked me to meet with her board to talk about the evolution of chapter publications, websites, enewsletters and social media. I’ve had similar conversations with leaders from other chapters – big and small – and the short version is that it’s really difficult for associations led by volunteers to come to grips with the new member communications model that’s emerging. They all feel pressured right now by all sorts of factors (key members, sponsors, etc.) to abandon their printed publications and materials and go all digital. I’ll tell you what I told the Peaks & Prairies board: It needs to be a planned transition, not an overnight switch. You have to communicate across multiple platforms these days: print, website, email and social media. It’s “cheaper” but harder and even more time-consuming than just killing trees and printing newsletters. If you’re a chapter leader and you want to learn more, give me a call and I’ll be glad to dispense my usual free opinions about the issue. This is daunting stuff for small association like Peaks & Prairies – and dozens more like it out there – but it’s just the tip of the iceberg in terms of challenges faced by local associations these days. Here are the really big concerns:
What’s really cool about the field staff concept is it’s a two-way conduit. In addition to the help they provide in the boonies, they do something else that’s important: They communicate what’s going on out in the real world back to GCSAA leadership in Lawrence. I’ve always felt that the headquarters staff was pretty insular and disconnected from the “real world” of working superintendents and that too much of their effort was directed at the needs of the top 20 percent who serve on committees and come to the national show. My sense is that’s changing thanks, in part, to some new voices on the board and the reality check provided by having staff out in the field every day. I sincerely hope this new pipeline of understanding leads to a more pragmatic and connected GCSAA in the future. If it doesn’t, we risk becoming more fragmented and having the chasm between the haves and the have nots grow wider. That would inevitably spell the end of the sense of fraternity that’s always made this business special. Let’s not let that happen as we rush toward the future. |
Explore the November 2013 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Golf Course Industry
- Editor’s notebook: Green Start Academy 2024
- USGA focuses on inclusion, sustainability in 2024
- Greens with Envy 65: Carolina on our mind
- Five Iron Golf expands into Minnesota
- Global sports group 54 invests in Turfgrass
- Hawaii's Mauna Kea Golf Course announces reopening
- Georgia GCSA honors superintendent of the year
- Reel Turf Techs: Alex Tessman